Creation Date: 09.06.2026 | 0 Comments

AI-Powered Decision-Making: Transparent and Traceable

Steinbeis Team Develops AI Agent System as an Audit-Ready Foundation for Management Teams

Companies make decisions with far-reaching implications every day – from investments and product roadmaps to compliance issues. AI tools are already being used in decision-making processes but often remain opaque and difficult to substantiate. This is precisely where the technology project of the Steinbeis Research Center Management Automation comes in: its goal is to develop a transparent AI agent system for internal organizational decision support. The system integrates LLMs, a decision aggregator for weighting expert opinions, and structured recommendations outputs. It is designed to be traceable and extensible.

The methodological approach covers system development – including agent roles, aggregation logic, and interfaces – as well as use-case simulation through business scenario testing and evaluation through user studies and comparisons with existing tools.

The Idea: Roles Instead of a Black Box

At the heart of the system is a multi-agent approach: several AI agents – such as CEO, Legal, Controlling, Marketing and Strategy – assess a decision-making issue from their respective perspectives. Each response follows a standardized JSON schema (recommendation, rationale, risks, opportunities, confidence). A decision aggregator consolidates the individual assessments using weighted criteria and generates an overall recommendation – including conditions (‘approve subject to conditions’) and a concise management summary. The aggregator translates the specialist logic of real-world roles into specialised AI agents, generates structured and traceable outputs, and creates transparency.

The approach is particularly compelling due to three key advantages:

  • Explainable: Justifications, risks and sources are visible.
  • Comparable: Each role follows a uniform format..
  • Auditable: Results can be versioned, exported and audited.

Research, SMEs, and Consulting in Collaboration

The project is designed as a collaborative technology initiative. Academic partners investigate acceptance, explainability and process impact (decision support systems, explainable AI, organizational psychology). Companies contribute real-world use cases as pilot partners (investments, supplier selection, location decisions, budget issues). Consulting partners test the system in workshops and develop templates and transfer formats.

The open nature of the core enables participation and rapid iteration; proprietary extensions such as industry-specific roles or CRM connectors, remain optional.

Results, Timeline and Participation

“We are looking for pilot companies from industry, services, and administration, as well as research partners from business informatics, psychology, and law, and transfer partners for workshops and training,” explains Steinbeis entrepreneur Dr. Helmut Döring. The project timeline spans two phases:

  • Spring 2026 (project objectives): MVP with at least five agent roles, JSON schema, aggregator, export; piloting with one to two partners; evaluation studies on acceptance, time-to-decision and quality of rationale.
  • Summer 2026 (further development): API integration (ERP/CRM), RAG enhancement, multi-user operation; governance functions (audit trail, roles/permissions concept); optional Docker/Kubernetes deployment.

Outlook: From Decision Log to Learning Organization
In the long term, the agent system can evolve into a learning decision archive: Which justifications led to which outcomes in the past? Which conditions proved effective? This creates an organization-wide memory – data-driven, explainable and scalable.

At a Glance: AI Agent System for Transparent Decision Support

The AI agent system for transparent decision support is a collaborative technology project run by the Steinbeis Research Center Management Automation.

  • Objective: Transparent, structured decision support
  • Approach: Role-based AI agents and aggregation
  • Output: JSON, PDF, executive summary, approval conditions
  • Operation: Local deployment (on-premises/VPS) or managed inference in the EU
  • Applications: Industry, services, public administration
  • Status: Prototype completed, pilot partners currently being sought

Methodology and Technology: RAG, Inference, Aggregation

  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Relevant excerpts from internal documents (guidelines, contracts, key figures) are incorporated into the agent prompts – responses are verifiable and up to date.
  • Inference: The agents use existing and modified language models, such as the LLaMA or Mistral family, either locally or as a managed service.
  • Aggregation: The overall recommendation takes into account weightings and conflicts, such as legal versus marketing, and generates an executive summary.

Technology stack (MVP): Web UI (Streamlit/optional FastAPI plus frontend), Python-basedagent engine, JSON validator, export (PDF/JSON), optional RAG index (e.g. pgvector). For inference, an EU-hosted managed service can be used, or alternatively local models.

  • Practical Application ScenariosInvestment and project approvals: CEO and Controlling assess ROI, Legal evaluates regulatory requirements, and Strategy reviews the roadmap. The result is approval, rejection, or conditional approval.
  • Compliance checks: Legal and IT Security assess data protection and liability risks; Marketing evaluates reputational impact.
  • Product go-to-market: Marketing analyzes the market and positioning; CEO and Strategy assesses differentiation; Controlling evaluates costs and break-even.
  • Public sector and NGOs: Prioritization of funding applications with clear justifications and sources.

What Makes This Project Special

  1. Transparency rather than intuition: Structured, evidence-based justifications for each role.
  2. Transferability: Roles and criteria can be customised and quickly adapted to different sectors or organizations.
  3. On-premises or managed: Deployment on-premises, on a VPS, or via managed inference, depending on data protection requirements.
  4. Open and extensible: Open core with optional modules, such as interfaces, permissions/roles, and dashboards).

Data Protection, Security, and Governance

  • EU hosting and local operation are possible; data minimization and pseudonymization are provided for.
  • Audit trail: Prompts, responses, aggregation decisions, and exports can be documented in an audit-ready manner.
  • Policy compliance: Policies, such as data protection and compliance requirements, can be integrated via RAG with source references.

Research Questions

  • How can multidimensional business decisions be simulated and presented in a structured way using AI agents?
  • To what extent does a role-based agent model lead to more transparent decisions?
  • What differences arise compared with centralized AI systems, such as LLM black boxes?
  • What requirements do specialist departments have regarding explainable AI in decision-making processes?

Contact

Dr. Helmut Döring (author)

Steinbeis Entrepreneur
Steinbeis Research Center Management Automation(Niederwenigern)

234218-51
Last changed 09.06.2026

Write a comment

By clicking the 'Send Request' button, I agree to the use of my data in accordance with the Steinbeis privacy policy.
Please fill out the fields marked with * completely.